Simms v. NHS Tayside [2007] ScotSC 61 (25 October 2007)
The pursuer's pleadings failed to aver that the conduct of the midwifery staff was such that no midwife of ordinary skill would have acted similarly if exercising ordinary care, as required by the third limb of the Hunter v Hanley test. This omission is fatal to the relevancy of the case, and the action must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2007] ScotSC 61
- Parties
- Pursuer: Laura Simms; Defender: NHS Tayside
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Debate on Preliminary Plea (plea in Law)
- Outcome
- action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pleading Requirements, Hunter V Hanley Test, Standard of Care, Medical Malpractice, Fair Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laura Simms
Pursuer
NHS Tayside
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Debate on Preliminary Plea (plea in Law)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's pleadings meet the requirements of the Hunter v Hanley test for medical negligence
- 2 Whether the action should be dismissed as irrelevant for failure to aver the third limb of the Hunter v Hanley test
- 3 Whether subsidiary pleading defects justify dismissal
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's pleadings failed to aver that the conduct of the midwifery staff was such that no midwife of ordinary skill would have acted similarly if exercising ordinary care, as required by the third limb of the Hunter v Hanley test. This omission is fatal to the relevancy of the case, and the action must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
action dismissed
Orders
- Record to be opened up and amended as specified
- Defender's first plea in law sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment