Southern Bowling Club, Ltd v. Ross [1902] ScotLR 39_292 (08 January 1902)
Police, acting under section 13 of the Public Houses Acts Amendment (Scotland) Act 1862, are entitled to enter and inspect private clubs where there is reason to suspect unlawful trafficking in excisable liquors, and the use of disguise by police for detection purposes is not illegal. The pursuers failed to show any invasion of legal rights or grounds for declarator or interdict.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_292
- Parties
- Pursuer: Southern Bowling Club, Limited; Defender: Roderick Ross; Defender: Hugh Calder
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; judgment for defenders affirmed; defenders assoilzied from all conclusions
- Legal Topics
- Police Entry Into Private Premises, Shebeening, Statutory Interpretation, Powers of Constables, Declarator and Interdict, Club Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Southern Bowling Club, Limited
Pursuer
Roderick Ross
Defender
Hugh Calder
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police may lawfully enter a private club in disguise to detect illegal liquor trafficking (shebeening) under the Public Houses Acts Amendment (Scotland) Act 1862, section 13.
- 2 Whether such entry or use of disguise by police is illegal or warrants declarator or interdict against the police.
Ratio Decidendi
Police, acting under section 13 of the Public Houses Acts Amendment (Scotland) Act 1862, are entitled to enter and inspect private clubs where there is reason to suspect unlawful trafficking in excisable liquors, and the use of disguise by police for detection purposes is not illegal. The pursuers failed to show any invasion of legal rights or grounds for declarator or interdict.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; judgment for defenders affirmed; defenders assoilzied from all conclusions
Orders
- Defenders assoilzied from all conclusions of the summons
- No declarator or interdict granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment