Ingram-Johnson v. Century Insurance Co., Ltd [1909] ScotLR 746 (28 May 1909)
The pursuer's letter of 12 December 1906 constituted an acceptance of the insurer's standing offer to surrender the policy for a cash payment, thereby forming a concluded contract. The absence of completed formalities (endorsement, payment) did not prevent the contract from being binding. After acceptance, the only liability of the insurer was to pay the surrender value, and the policyholder could not withdraw from the bargain.
- Citation
- [1909] ScotLR 746
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Dr Ingram-Johnson; Defender/reclaimer: Century Insurance Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Contract Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; defenders assoilzied (absolved from liability).
- Legal Topics
- Policy Surrender, Offer and Acceptance, Concluded Contract, Locus Poenitentiae
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Ingram-Johnson
Pursuer/respondent
Century Insurance Company, Limited
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Insurance Contract Dispute / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's letter of 12 December 1906 constituted a binding acceptance of a standing offer to surrender the policy for cash value, thus extinguishing further rights under the policy.
- 2 Whether the absence of formalities (endorsement, payment) prevented the contract of surrender from being concluded.
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's letter of 12 December 1906 constituted an acceptance of the insurer's standing offer to surrender the policy for a cash payment, thereby forming a concluded contract. The absence of completed formalities (endorsement, payment) did not prevent the contract from being binding. After acceptance, the only liability of the insurer was to pay the surrender value, and the policyholder could not withdraw from the bargain.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; defenders assoilzied (absolved from liability).
Orders
- Lord Ordinary's decision recalled.
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved from liability).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment