Parish Council of Cavers v. Parish Councils of Smail-Holm and Urr [1908] ScotLR 170 (26 November 1908)

Parish Council of Cavers v. Parish Councils of Smail-Holm and Urr [1908] ScotLR 170 (26 November 1908)

Residence from 29 May 1900 to 28 May 1903 does not constitute three years under the Poor Law (Scotland) Act 1898, sec. 1, as the period must extend to the same calendar day three years later; thus, settlement was not acquired in Smailholm.

Citation
[1908] ScotLR 170
Parties
Pursuer/appellant: Parish Council of Cavers; Defender/respondent: Parish Council of Smailholm; Defender/respondent: Parish Council of Urr
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
26 November 1908
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Outcome
appeal refused; judgment of Sheriff adhered to
Legal Topics
Poor Law, Settlement, Computation of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Parish Council of Cavers

Pursuer/appellant

Parish Council of Smailholm

Defender/respondent

Parish Council of Urr

Defender/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House

  1. 1 Whether residence from 29 May 1900 to 28 May 1903 constitutes 'three years' continuous residence under the Poor Law (Scotland) Act 1898, sec. 1, for settlement purposes.

Ratio Decidendi

Residence from 29 May 1900 to 28 May 1903 does not constitute three years under the Poor Law (Scotland) Act 1898, sec. 1, as the period must extend to the same calendar day three years later; thus, settlement was not acquired in Smailholm.

Court Disposition

appeal refused; judgment of Sheriff adhered to

Orders

  • Parish Council of Urr to repay Parish Council of Cavers £16, 18s. 10d. with interest as concluded for.
  • Parish Council of Urr liable to Parish Council of Smailholm for expenses of the appeal.