Barratt Scotland Ltd v Keith [1992] ScotCS CSIH_5 (10 December 1992)
The obligation to deliver a disposition under missives of sale is an obligation relating to land within the meaning of para. 2(e) of Schedule 1 to the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, and is therefore subject to the 20-year prescription period, not the 5-year period. The Lord Ordinary was correct to repel the defender's plea of prescription and to allow proof before answer on the pursuers' averments of loss.
- Citation
- [1992] ScotCS CSIH_5
- Parties
- Pursuer: Barratt Scotland Ltd; Defender: Keith
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor Allowing Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Prescription, Obligations Relating to Land, Missives of Sale, Personal Vs Real Rights, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barratt Scotland Ltd
Pursuer
Keith
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor Allowing Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the obligation to deliver a disposition under missives of sale is an 'obligation relating to land' under para. 2(e) of Schedule 1 to the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, thus subject to 20-year prescription rather than 5 years.
- 2 Whether the averments of loss in the pursuer's pleadings were sufficiently relevant and specific to go to proof before answer.
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation to deliver a disposition under missives of sale is an obligation relating to land within the meaning of para. 2(e) of Schedule 1 to the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, and is therefore subject to the 20-year prescription period, not the 5-year period. The Lord Ordinary was correct to repel the defender's plea of prescription and to allow proof before answer on the pursuers' averments of loss.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
Orders
- Repel defender's third plea-in-law (prescription)
- Repel defender's first plea-in-law (personal bar)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment