THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS v. WAYNE HOLLOWAY [2009] ScotSC 160 (20 October 2009)
On the balance of probabilities, the seized cash was obtained through unlawful conduct, specifically involvement in the supply of controlled drugs, and was intended for use in furtherance of drug-related transactions. The defender's explanations for the source of funds were not credible or reliable. Forfeiture is justified under Section 298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotSC 160
- Parties
- Minuter: The Scottish Ministers, Civil Recovery Unit; Defender: Wayne Peter Holloway
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Recovery Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- forfeiture granted
- Legal Topics
- Proceeds of Crime, Drug Offences, Forfeiture, Unlawful Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Scottish Ministers, Civil Recovery Unit
Minuter
Wayne Peter Holloway
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Recovery Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the seized cash represents proceeds of unlawful conduct under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
- 2 Whether the cash was intended for use in unlawful conduct
- 3 Whether the defender's explanations for the source of funds are credible
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the seized cash was obtained through unlawful conduct, specifically involvement in the supply of controlled drugs, and was intended for use in furtherance of drug-related transactions. The defender's explanations for the source of funds were not credible or reliable. Forfeiture is justified under Section 298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Court Disposition
forfeiture granted
Orders
- Forfeiture of £12,100 sterling plus accrued interest under Section 298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
- Cause continued on question of expenses; parties to be heard thereon
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment