INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS AND INQUIRIES (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDEN DEATH OF IRENE MARGARET HOGG [2010] ScotSC 41 (18 January 2010)
The court determined that Irene Hogg died as a result of immersion in water and paracetamol toxicity, with the immersion likely causing a fatal cardiac arrest. No reasonable precautions or defects in the system of working were identified that could have prevented the death. The court declined to make additional findings under section 6(1)(e) as the proposed facts did not meet the threshold of public interest relevance required by the Act.
- Citation
- [2010] ScotSC 41
- Parties
- Applicant: Procurator Fiscal; Interested Party (brother of Deceased): Roger Hogg; Interested Party: HM Inspectorate of Education; Interested Party: Scottish Borders Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination
- Outcome
- Formal determination under section 6(1)(a) and (b) only; no findings under (c), (d), or (e).
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accident Inquiry, Workplace Stress, School Inspection, Employer Duty of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Procurator Fiscal
Applicant
Roger Hogg
Interested Party (brother of Deceased)
HM Inspectorate of Education
Interested Party
Scottish Borders Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 What were the circumstances and cause of Irene Margaret Hogg's death?
- 2 Were there any reasonable precautions or defects in the system of working that contributed to the death?
- 3 Were any additional facts relevant to the circumstances of the death to be set out under section 6(1)(e) of the 1976 Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that Irene Hogg died as a result of immersion in water and paracetamol toxicity, with the immersion likely causing a fatal cardiac arrest. No reasonable precautions or defects in the system of working were identified that could have prevented the death. The court declined to make additional findings under section 6(1)(e) as the proposed facts did not meet the threshold of public interest relevance required by the Act.
Court Disposition
Formal determination under section 6(1)(a) and (b) only; no findings under (c), (d), or (e).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment