APPLICATIONS UNDER SECTION 128 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND LICENSING (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010 IN PROCURATOR FISCAL, DUNDEE AGAINST (FIRST) WTH, PERTH; (SECOND) CJS, DUNDEE; AND (THIRD) GM Ltd [2016] ScotSC 15 (26 February 2016)
Section 121(3) applies to information about the nature and direction of the police operation (Operation Cartogram), the officers involved, instructions given, activities undertaken, and reports made, as well as full details of the multi-agency visit to GM Ltd on 4 June 2014, including participants, powers exercised, statements, reports, and items seized. The police and Crown applied the wrong test for disclosure, focusing on materiality to the charge rather than to the case for or against the accused. The statutory disclosure regime and fair trial rights require disclosure of this information to avoid placing the defence at a disadvantage and to ensure transparency and fairness.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSC 15
- Parties
- Applicant: Procurator Fiscal, Dundee; First Accused: WTH, Perth; Second Accused: CJS, Dundee; Third Accused: GM Ltd, Dundee
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Disclosure Application / Ruling on Applications Under Section 128 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (scotland) Act 2010
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part; ruling that section 121(3) applies to specified categories of information.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Evidence, Surveillance, Fair Trial Rights, Police Powers, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Procurator Fiscal, Dundee
Applicant
WTH, Perth
First Accused
CJS, Dundee
Second Accused
GM Ltd, Dundee
Third Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Disclosure Application / Ruling on Applications Under Section 128 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (scotland) Act 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 121(3) of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 applies to specified items of information sought by the accused
- 2 Whether the police and prosecutor have complied with statutory disclosure duties
- 3 Whether the context of police operations and surveillance must be disclosed to ensure a fair trial
Ratio Decidendi
Section 121(3) applies to information about the nature and direction of the police operation (Operation Cartogram), the officers involved, instructions given, activities undertaken, and reports made, as well as full details of the multi-agency visit to GM Ltd on 4 June 2014, including participants, powers exercised, statements, reports, and items seized. The police and Crown applied the wrong test for disclosure, focusing on materiality to the charge rather than to the case for or against the accused. The statutory disclosure regime and fair trial rights require disclosure of this information to avoid placing the defence at a disadvantage and to ensure transparency and fairness.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part; ruling that section 121(3) applies to specified categories of information.
Orders
- Section 121(3) applies to information regarding the purpose, direction, participants, instructions, activities, and reports of the police operation involving PCs F and C as it related to the first and second accused.
- Section 121(3) applies to information regarding the multi-agency visit to GM Ltd on 4 June 2014, including aim, briefing, coordination, participants, agencies, positions, contact addresses, powers exercised, statements, reports, and items seized.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment