King v. Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon [2011] ScotHC HCJAC 109 (27 October 2011)
Conviction under section 50A(1)(b) requires proof that the accused acted with malice and ill-will based on the victim's membership of a racial group; absence of findings on this essential element renders the conviction unsustainable.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotHC HCJAC 109
- Parties
- Complainer: Edith Jane King; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Suspension / Appeal Following Reference by Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Outcome
- conviction suspended
- Legal Topics
- Racially Aggravated Conduct, Mens Rea, Statutory Interpretation, European Convention on Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edith Jane King
Complainer
Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Suspension / Appeal Following Reference by Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under section 50A(1)(b) of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 requires proof of mens rea
- 2 Whether the offence is one of strict liability or requires malicious intent
- 3 Whether Article 10 and Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights are engaged
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under section 50A(1)(b) requires proof that the accused acted with malice and ill-will based on the victim's membership of a racial group; absence of findings on this essential element renders the conviction unsustainable.
Court Disposition
conviction suspended
Orders
- bill of suspension passed
- conviction quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment