Holman Fenwick Willian LLP & Anor v Procurator Fiscal, Glasgow [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_39 (07 June 2017)
Although the Crown's actions were legally oppressive, they were not in bad faith and there was some basis for seeking recovery of part of the material; thus, a modified award of expenses is justified, not a general unmodified award.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_39
- Parties
- Complainer: Holman Fenwick Willan LLP; Complainer: Duff & Phelps Ltd; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Suspension / Application for Expenses Following Suspension of Warrant
- Outcome
- Award of expenses to complainers, modified to a fixed sum.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Privilege, Search Warrants, Expenses in Criminal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
Complainer
Duff & Phelps Ltd
Complainer
Procurator Fiscal, Glasgow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Suspension / Application for Expenses Following Suspension of Warrant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown's application for a search warrant was oppressive
- 2 Whether an award of expenses should be made and on what scale
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Crown's actions were legally oppressive, they were not in bad faith and there was some basis for seeking recovery of part of the material; thus, a modified award of expenses is justified, not a general unmodified award.
Court Disposition
Award of expenses to complainers, modified to a fixed sum.
Orders
- Award of expenses to complainers fixed at £10,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment