Logan & Anor v. Procurator Fiscal [2008] ScotHC HCJAC_61 (02 July 2008)
Section 45 of the 2007 Act is within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament as its purpose is to increase the sentencing powers of the sheriff court generally and to apply Scots criminal law consistently to both common law and statutory offences; modifications to reserved matters are incidental and necessary to achieve this purpose.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotHC HCJAC_61
- Parties
- Complainer: Robert Logan; Complainer: James William Beattie; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Hamilton; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Jedburgh; Intervener: Advocate General
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Bills of Suspension / Appeal
- Outcome
- bills of suspension refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Powers, Reserved Matters, Legislative Competence, Road Traffic Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Logan
Complainer
James William Beattie
Complainer
Procurator Fiscal, Hamilton
Respondent
Procurator Fiscal, Jedburgh
Respondent
Advocate General
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Bills of Suspension / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 45 of the Criminal Proceedings etc. (Reform) (Scotland) Act 2007 validly increased the maximum summary sentence for contravening section 103(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 given the reserved status of road transport under the Scotland Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
Section 45 of the 2007 Act is within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament as its purpose is to increase the sentencing powers of the sheriff court generally and to apply Scots criminal law consistently to both common law and statutory offences; modifications to reserved matters are incidental and necessary to achieve this purpose.
Court Disposition
bills of suspension refused
Orders
- Both bills of suspension are refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment