KENNETH WILLIAM MILTON v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, PERTH [1999] ScotHC 6 (12th January, 1999)
The sheriff's remarks during the evidence, in the absence of any contradiction or explanation, created a risk that justice was not evidently being done, and thus the conviction could not safely stand.
- Citation
- [1999] ScotHC 6
- Parties
- Complainer: Kenneth William Milton; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Perth
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Suspension / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Conviction set aside; Bill of Suspension passed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Impartiality, Conduct of Judge, Appeal Against Conviction, Theft
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth William Milton
Complainer
Procurator Fiscal, Perth
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Suspension / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether remarks made by the sheriff during trial indicated prejudgment and compromised judicial impartiality, thereby tainting the conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff's remarks during the evidence, in the absence of any contradiction or explanation, created a risk that justice was not evidently being done, and thus the conviction could not safely stand.
Court Disposition
Conviction set aside; Bill of Suspension passed.
Orders
- Conviction quashed.
- Pleas in law sustained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment