Summit Lease Finance (No 2) Ltd v Lithoprint (Scotland) Ltd [1999] ScotCS 174 (16 July 1999)

Summit Lease Finance (No 2) Ltd v Lithoprint (Scotland) Ltd [1999] ScotCS 174 (16 July 1999)

A proof before answer is appropriate in this case for the reasons set out in the related opinion in Case No. CA86/98.

Citation
[1999] ScotCS 174
Parties
Pursuer: Summit Lease Finance (No.2) Limited; Defender: Lithoprint (Scotland) Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
16 July 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory (proof Before Answer Allowed)
Outcome
Proof before answer allowed on the whole matter.
Legal Topics
Proof Before Answer, Interlocutory Orders
Civil Procedure Proof Before Answer Interlocutory Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Summit Lease Finance (No.2) Limited

Pursuer

Lithoprint (Scotland) Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory (proof Before Answer Allowed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a proof before answer should be allowed on the whole matter

Ratio Decidendi

A proof before answer is appropriate in this case for the reasons set out in the related opinion in Case No. CA86/98.

Court Disposition

Proof before answer allowed on the whole matter.

Orders

  • Proof before answer allowed on the whole matter.