Smith v Advocate General For Scotland [2001] ScotCS 13 (19 January 2001)

Smith v Advocate General For Scotland [2001] ScotCS 13 (19 January 2001)

The pursuer's pleadings were insufficiently specific and failed to establish that psychiatric injury to the pursuer was foreseeable by the defender or Mr Fotheringham. The pleadings did not provide fair notice of a relevant case, and thus the action was dismissed without proof.

Citation
[2001] ScotCS 13
Parties
Pursuer: Robin Fairlie Smith; Defender: The Rt Hon Lynda Clark, Q.C., M.P., Advocate General for Scotland
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
19 January 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll (pleading Stage)
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Psychiatric Injury, Vicarious Liability, Employer's Duty of Care, Workplace Bullying, Pleading Sufficiency

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robin Fairlie Smith

Pursuer

The Rt Hon Lynda Clark, Q.C., M.P., Advocate General for Scotland

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Procedure Roll (pleading Stage)

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer's pleadings disclose a relevant case of foreseeable psychiatric injury caused by workplace conduct
  2. 2 Whether the defender can be held vicariously liable for the alleged acts of Mr Fotheringham
  3. 3 Whether the pleadings provide sufficient notice and specificity to entitle the pursuer to proof

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer's pleadings were insufficiently specific and failed to establish that psychiatric injury to the pursuer was foreseeable by the defender or Mr Fotheringham. The pleadings did not provide fair notice of a relevant case, and thus the action was dismissed without proof.

Court Disposition

action dismissed

Orders

  • Sustained the defender's first plea-in-law and dismissed the action.