M'Cormick v. Caledonian Railway Co. [1904] ScotLR 41_282 (04 February 1904)

M'Cormick v. Caledonian Railway Co. [1904] ScotLR 41_282 (04 February 1904)

A railway company is not legally obliged to protect a passenger who, after alighting from a train in a state of helpless intoxication, is exposed to perils due to his own condition. The company's duty ends upon safe carriage and provision of access and egress; no further duty arises unless expressly assumed.

Citation
[1904] ScotLR 41_282
Parties
Pursuer: Michael M'Cormick; Defender: Caledonian Railway Company
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
04 February 1904
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Dismissal at First Instance
Outcome
appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant
Legal Topics
Railway Liability, Duty of Care, Carriage of Passengers, Intoxicated Passengers, Negligence
Tort Contract Railway Liability Duty of Care Carriage of Passengers Intoxicated Passengers Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael M'Cormick

Pursuer

Caledonian Railway Company

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Dismissal at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a railway company owes a duty of care to protect a helplessly intoxicated passenger after alighting from a train
  2. 2 Whether the company's porter, having undertaken to assist, created a further legal obligation

Ratio Decidendi

A railway company is not legally obliged to protect a passenger who, after alighting from a train in a state of helpless intoxication, is exposed to perils due to his own condition. The company's duty ends upon safe carriage and provision of access and egress; no further duty arises unless expressly assumed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant

Orders

  • Court adhered to the Lord Ordinary's dismissal of the action.