GAGE, PETITION OF WILLIAM LEWIS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF HIS DETENTION BY THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS IN CONDITIONS IN WHICH HE IS EXPOSED INDOORS TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE [2015] ScotCS CSOH_174 (16 December 2015)
The exercise of the respondents’ powers to detain the petitioner in conditions exposing him to environmental tobacco smoke, while unfortunate, falls within the range of reasonable responses given the ongoing implementation of government policy, the complexities of prison management, and the need to consider the impact on the entire prison estate. The respondents are actively addressing the issue, and the situation is not comparable to cases where authorities failed to act despite capacity and resources.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_174
- Parties
- Petitioner: William Lewis Gage; Respondents: Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition refused
- Legal Topics
- Reasonableness of Detention, Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke, Prisoner Health, Exercise of Statutory Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Lewis Gage
Petitioner
Scottish Ministers
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it unreasonable and unlawful for the Scottish Ministers to detain the petitioner in conditions exposing him indoors to environmental tobacco smoke?
- 2 Did the respondents fail to consider reasonable alternatives to protect non-smoking prisoners from ETS?
Ratio Decidendi
The exercise of the respondents’ powers to detain the petitioner in conditions exposing him to environmental tobacco smoke, while unfortunate, falls within the range of reasonable responses given the ongoing implementation of government policy, the complexities of prison management, and the need to consider the impact on the entire prison estate. The respondents are actively addressing the issue, and the situation is not comparable to cases where authorities failed to act despite capacity and resources.
Court Disposition
petition refused
Orders
- petitioner’s plea in law repelled
- respondents’ third and fourth pleas in law sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment