Semple Cochrane Plc v Hughes [2001] ScotCS 192 (25 July 2001)
The court held that the dispensing power under Rule 2.1(1) is competent to relieve a party from the 7-day time limit in Rule 19.2(1) where the failure was due to mistake or oversight, and that justice required recall of the decree in absence so that the substantive issues could be tried on their merits.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 192
- Parties
- Pursuer: Semple Cochrane Plc; Defender: Gerald John Hughes
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motion to Recall Decree in Absence
- Outcome
- decree in absence recalled; defences allowed to be received; no expenses due to or by in respect of the motion
- Legal Topics
- Recall of Decree in Absence, Relief From Non Compliance, Unjust Enrichment, Repetition, Professional Courtesy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Semple Cochrane Plc
Pursuer
Gerald John Hughes
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion to Recall Decree in Absence
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it competent to use the general dispensing power under Rule 2.1(1) to recall a decree in absence after the 7-day time limit in Rule 19.2(1)?
- 2 Should the court exercise its discretion to grant relief from the time limit in the circumstances of this case?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the dispensing power under Rule 2.1(1) is competent to relieve a party from the 7-day time limit in Rule 19.2(1) where the failure was due to mistake or oversight, and that justice required recall of the decree in absence so that the substantive issues could be tried on their merits.
Court Disposition
decree in absence recalled; defences allowed to be received; no expenses due to or by in respect of the motion
Orders
- decree in absence recalled
- defences allowed to be received
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment