ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL v JOSEPHINE CLARE LINZEE GORDON [2016] ScotSC 0 (10 February 2016)
Section 21 of the 1983 Act does not confer on local authorities the power to make binding determinations of liability against transferees; it sets out factual conditions for liability, which are to be determined by the court. The sheriff court is competent to determine whether those conditions are met, and the matter should proceed to proof. The pursuer’s preliminary plea is therefore repelled.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSC 0
- Parties
- Pursuer: Argyll and Bute Council; Defender: Josephine Clare Linzee Gordon
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy of Defence; Preliminary Plea Repelled, Proof Allowed
- Outcome
- Pursuer’s preliminary plea repelled; proof allowed; procedural hearing assigned.
- Legal Topics
- Recovery of Care Accommodation Charges, Gratuitous Alienation, Statutory Interpretation, Liability of Transferees, Judicial Review Vs. Ordinary Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Argyll and Bute Council
Pursuer
Josephine Clare Linzee Gordon
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy of Defence; Preliminary Plea Repelled, Proof Allowed
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 21 of the Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Act 1983 confer on a local authority the power to make a binding determination of liability on a transferee?
- 2 Is the only means of challenging such liability judicial review, or can the sheriff court determine the factual basis for liability under section 21?
- 3 Are the statutory regimes under section 21 of the 1983 Act and section 22 of the National Assistance Act 1948 part of a single unitary scheme?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 21 of the 1983 Act does not confer on local authorities the power to make binding determinations of liability against transferees; it sets out factual conditions for liability, which are to be determined by the court. The sheriff court is competent to determine whether those conditions are met, and the matter should proceed to proof. The pursuer’s preliminary plea is therefore repelled.
Court Disposition
Pursuer’s preliminary plea repelled; proof allowed; procedural hearing assigned.
Orders
- Repels the pursuer’s second plea in law.
- Allows parties a proof of their respective averments on dates to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment