Robertson v. S. Henderson & Sons, Ltd [1904] ScotLR 41_597 (02 June 1904)

Robertson v. S. Henderson & Sons, Ltd [1904] ScotLR 41_597 (02 June 1904)

A settlement and discharge executed by a minor and his curator in respect of a Workmen's Compensation Act claim is voidable at common law on the ground of minority and lesion, and the Act does not exclude the application of common law principles; relevant averments of minority and lesion entitle the pursuer to proof.

Citation
[1904] ScotLR 41_597
Parties
Pursuer: James Robertson; Defender: S. Henderson & Sons, Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
02 June 1904
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor Allowing Proof Before Answer
Outcome
Proof before answer allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; action not dismissed as irrelevant.
Legal Topics
Reduction of Contract, Minority and Lesion, Workmen's Compensation, Competency of Settlement Agreements, Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Robertson

Pursuer

S. Henderson & Sons, Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor Allowing Proof Before Answer

  1. 1 Whether a settlement and discharge executed by a minor and his curator in respect of a Workmen's Compensation Act claim is voidable on the ground of minority and lesion
  2. 2 Whether the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 precludes reduction of such agreements on common law grounds
  3. 3 Whether averments of lesion are relevant where compensation would otherwise be fixed by arbitration

Ratio Decidendi

A settlement and discharge executed by a minor and his curator in respect of a Workmen's Compensation Act claim is voidable at common law on the ground of minority and lesion, and the Act does not exclude the application of common law principles; relevant averments of minority and lesion entitle the pursuer to proof.

Court Disposition

Proof before answer allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; action not dismissed as irrelevant.

Orders

  • Proof of averments of minority and lesion allowed before answer.
  • Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.