Craig v. Edinburgh Parish Council [1917] ScotLR 146 (08 December 1917)
Where parties have joined issue in the Sheriff Court on the construction of section 82 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1913, the only competent mode of review is by statutory appeal under section 166; failure to use that procedure precludes reduction unless the proceedings are fundamentally null, which they were not.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 146
- Parties
- Pursuer (reclaimer): Robert Archibald Craig, C.A., as trustee on the sequestrated estates of David James Tough and the Wholesale and Retail Wallpaper Company, and as an individual; Defenders (respondents): Parish Council of Edinburgh and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (reduction) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Reduction of Decree, Competency of Action, Appeal Procedure, Trustee Duties, Preferential Creditors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Archibald Craig, C.A., as trustee on the sequestrated estates of David James Tough and the Wholesale and Retail Wallpaper Company, and as an individual
Pursuer (reclaimer)
Parish Council of Edinburgh and others
Defenders (respondents)
Procedural Posture
Civil (reduction) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action for reduction of the Sheriff Court decrees was competent given the statutory appeal procedure under section 166 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1913.
- 2 Whether the Sheriff Court proceedings were so fundamentally null as to justify reduction.
Ratio Decidendi
Where parties have joined issue in the Sheriff Court on the construction of section 82 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1913, the only competent mode of review is by statutory appeal under section 166; failure to use that procedure precludes reduction unless the proceedings are fundamentally null, which they were not.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to.
Orders
- Sustained second plea-in-law for defenders.
- Dismissed the action for reduction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment