Spring v. Milnes (Martin's Trustees) and Others [1910] ScotLR 703 (08 July 1910)

Spring v. Milnes (Martin's Trustees) and Others [1910] ScotLR 703 (08 July 1910)

The jury's verdict for the pursuer on both issues was inconsistent and illogical, as the mental conditions required by the two issues could not coexist. There was no evidence to support the verdict on the second issue (facility and circumvention). The Court cannot sustain the verdict on one issue and set aside the other; the only proper course is to set aside the entire verdict and grant a new trial.

Citation
[1910] ScotLR 703
Parties
Pursuer: Robert Spring; Defenders: James Milne and George Milne (Martin's Trustees) and Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
08 July 1910
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion for New Trial After Jury Verdict
Outcome
verdict set aside; new trial granted
Legal Topics
Reduction of Will, Jury Trial, Incapacity, Facility and Circumvention, Inconsistent Verdicts, New Trial
Succession Law Civil Procedure Reduction of Will Jury Trial Incapacity Facility and Circumvention Inconsistent Verdicts New Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Spring

Pursuer

James Milne and George Milne (Martin's Trustees) and Others

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil / Motion for New Trial After Jury Verdict

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the jury's verdict for the pursuer on both issues (incapacity and facility/circumvention) was inconsistent and unsupported by evidence
  2. 2 Whether a new trial should be granted due to lack of evidence on the second issue and inconsistency of the verdict

Ratio Decidendi

The jury's verdict for the pursuer on both issues was inconsistent and illogical, as the mental conditions required by the two issues could not coexist. There was no evidence to support the verdict on the second issue (facility and circumvention). The Court cannot sustain the verdict on one issue and set aside the other; the only proper course is to set aside the entire verdict and grant a new trial.

Court Disposition

verdict set aside; new trial granted

Orders

  • The rule is made absolute.
  • The verdict is set aside.