Houston v. Aitken [1912] ScotLR 769 (15 June 1912)
Evidence of hereditary insanity in the testator's family is not necessarily irrelevant in civil cases; such evidence may be admissible if a proper foundation is laid, as it may assist medical experts in forming opinions relevant to the validity of the will.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 769
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Isabella C. Galloway or Houston; Defender: Isabella Aitken
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Appeal on Amendment and Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; amendment to record allowed; issues approved; case to proceed to jury trial.
- Legal Topics
- Reduction of Will, Hereditary Insanity, Admissibility of Evidence, Fraud and Circumvention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Isabella C. Galloway or Houston
Pursuer
Isabella Aitken
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Appeal on Amendment and Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Is evidence of hereditary insanity in the testator's family relevant and admissible in a civil action for reduction of a will?
- 2 Should the record be amended to include averments regarding family history of mental disease?
Ratio Decidendi
Evidence of hereditary insanity in the testator's family is not necessarily irrelevant in civil cases; such evidence may be admissible if a proper foundation is laid, as it may assist medical experts in forming opinions relevant to the validity of the will.
Court Disposition
Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; amendment to record allowed; issues approved; case to proceed to jury trial.
Orders
- Record to be amended as proposed in the minute of amendment.
- Issues approved for jury trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment