Lopes v. Greenock Corporation [1916] ScotLR 363 (27 January 1916)
A part of a building can be registered as a place of public refreshment under the Burgh Police (Scotland) Acts if it is divided from the remainder so as to be effectively closed to the public during forbidden hours; access by the proprietor or servants does not invalidate registration unless a bye-law specifically prohibits it.
- Citation
- [1916] ScotLR 363
- Parties
- Pursuer: Joseph Lopes; Defenders: Greenock Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 1916
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Public Refreshment Premises, Powers of Magistrates and Local Authorities, Interpretation of Burgh Police (scotland) Acts, Bye Laws on Opening and Closing Hours, Division of Premises for Licensing Purposes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Lopes
Pursuer
Greenock Corporation
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a part of a building can be registered as a place of public refreshment under the Burgh Police (Scotland) Acts if it is not permanently divided from the rest of the premises.
- 2 Whether the local authority (defenders) can refuse registration on the ground that the division is not effective to exclude the public during forbidden hours.
- 3 Whether access by servants to the registered part during forbidden hours invalidates registration.
Ratio Decidendi
A part of a building can be registered as a place of public refreshment under the Burgh Police (Scotland) Acts if it is divided from the remainder so as to be effectively closed to the public during forbidden hours; access by the proprietor or servants does not invalidate registration unless a bye-law specifically prohibits it.
Court Disposition
action dismissed
Orders
- Find that the pursuer is entitled to have part of the building registered as a place of public refreshment only if it is divided from the remainder so as to be effectively closed for business during forbidden hours.
- Find that such part may be effectively closed notwithstanding access by the pursuer or his servants for serving customers with refreshments for consumption off the premises.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment