Fitzgibbon v. Howden & Co. and Others [1917] ScotLR 190 (16 January 1917)
Although the case would ordinarily be suitable for jury trial, prevailing industrial and commercial conditions due to the war made it inappropriate to convene a jury, so the case was remitted back to the sheriff court for proof.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 190
- Parties
- Pursuer: Michael Fitzgibbon; Defenders: James Howden & Company, Limited, Glasgow, and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages Action / Application for Remit to Court of Session for Jury Trial
- Outcome
- application for remit to jury trial refused; case remitted to sheriff court for proof
- Legal Topics
- Remit for Jury Trial, Suitability for Jury Trial, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907 Section 30, War Conditions and Court Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Fitzgibbon
Pursuer
James Howden & Company, Limited, Glasgow, and others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages Action / Application for Remit to Court of Session for Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the case was suitable for jury trial under section 30 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 given prevailing war conditions
Ratio Decidendi
Although the case would ordinarily be suitable for jury trial, prevailing industrial and commercial conditions due to the war made it inappropriate to convene a jury, so the case was remitted back to the sheriff court for proof.
Court Disposition
application for remit to jury trial refused; case remitted to sheriff court for proof
Orders
- Refused pursuer's motion for jury trial.
- Remitted case to sheriff court for proof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment