Donnelly v. Safeway Stores & Ors [2002] ScotCS 282 (18 October 2002)
The sheriff misdirected himself by giving weight to the possibility of a jury trial as a factor in remitting the cause, especially given the procedural delays and uncertainty about whether a jury trial would occur. The appeal is allowed and the cause is remitted to the sheriff to proceed as accords.
- Citation
- [2002] ScotCS 282
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Isobel Donnelly; Defenders and Appellants: Safeway Stores plc and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Decision to Remit Cause to Court of Session
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Remit From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Jury Trial, Discretion of Sheriff, Delay in Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isobel Donnelly
Pursuer and Respondent
Safeway Stores plc and Others
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Decision to Remit Cause to Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in remitting the cause to the Court of Session based on the possibility of a jury trial and the importance of the case
- 2 Whether delay and procedural history should preclude remit
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff misdirected himself by giving weight to the possibility of a jury trial as a factor in remitting the cause, especially given the procedural delays and uncertainty about whether a jury trial would occur. The appeal is allowed and the cause is remitted to the sheriff to proceed as accords.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Remit to the sheriff to proceed as accords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment