Kelly v. James Fraser & Co. [1905] ScotLR 42_424 (10 March 1905)
Section 6 of the Employers' Liability Act 1880 does not impliedly exclude the right of either party to remove a cause to the Court of Session under section 40 of the Judicature Act 1825 after an order for proof has been pronounced; the precedent in Patons v. Niddrie and Benhar Coal Company, Limited is binding and indistinguishable from the present case.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 42_424
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Mrs Mary M'Cabe or Kelly; Defenders and Respondents: James Fraser & Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- defenders' objection to competency repelled; appeal allowed to proceed
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Cause, Competency of Appeal, Employers' Liability Act 1880, Sheriff Courts Act 1877, Judicature Act 1825, Jury Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Mary M'Cabe or Kelly
Pursuer and Appellant
James Fraser & Company
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 6 of the Employers' Liability Act 1880 excludes removal to the Court of Session under section 40 of the Judicature Act 1825 after an order for proof has been pronounced.
- 2 Whether the proper procedure for removal is exclusively under the Sheriff Courts Act 1877, section 9, or if the Judicature Act 1825, section 40, remains available.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 6 of the Employers' Liability Act 1880 does not impliedly exclude the right of either party to remove a cause to the Court of Session under section 40 of the Judicature Act 1825 after an order for proof has been pronounced; the precedent in Patons v. Niddrie and Benhar Coal Company, Limited is binding and indistinguishable from the present case.
Court Disposition
defenders' objection to competency repelled; appeal allowed to proceed
Orders
- Objection to competency of appeal repelled.
- Issue proposed by pursuer approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment