ASHTEAD PLANT HIRE COMPANY LIMITED AGAINST GRANTON CENTRAL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED [2019] ScotCS CSOH_7 (25 January 2019)
Disregard (4) in clause Third(c)(ii) of the lease, as amended, requires the surveyor to disregard the value of any buildings or other constructions erected on and any improvements carried out to the subjects of lease when ascertaining the open market rent; the natural and ordinary meaning of the words, in context, supports this interpretation, and the defender's alternative readings are inconsistent with the clause's language.
- Citation
- [2019] ScotCS CSOH_7
- Parties
- Pursuer: Ashtead Plant Hire Company Limited; Defender: Granton Central Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action (declarator) / Judgment After Debate (no Proof Sought)
- Outcome
- Declarator in favour of the pursuer (subject to adjustment of precise terms); case put out by order for discussion of declarator wording; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Rent Review, Interpretation of Lease Provisions, Effect of Disregards in Rent Review Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashtead Plant Hire Company Limited
Pursuer
Granton Central Developments Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (declarator) / Judgment After Debate (no Proof Sought)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the rent review clause in the lease requires the open market rent to be calculated disregarding the value of any buildings or constructions on the premises.
- 2 Proper interpretation of disregard (4) in clause Third(c)(ii) of the lease.
Ratio Decidendi
Disregard (4) in clause Third(c)(ii) of the lease, as amended, requires the surveyor to disregard the value of any buildings or other constructions erected on and any improvements carried out to the subjects of lease when ascertaining the open market rent; the natural and ordinary meaning of the words, in context, supports this interpretation, and the defender's alternative readings are inconsistent with the clause's language.
Court Disposition
Declarator in favour of the pursuer (subject to adjustment of precise terms); case put out by order for discussion of declarator wording; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Case put out by order for discussion of the precise terms of declarator to be granted.
- All questions of expenses reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment