Liebow v. Howat's Trustees [1901] ScotLR 38_255 (15 January 1901)
The action was dismissed as irrelevant because the alleged harm occurred after the property had passed to a new owner, at which point the defenders had neither duty nor power regarding the premises. Additionally, the pursuer, being aware of the defects, assumed the risk by remaining in the house.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_255
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: Hugh Liebow; Defenders/respondents: Robert Keay and others, trustees of the late George Howat
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant
- Legal Topics
- Reparation, Negligence, Defective Premises, Landlord's Duty, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh Liebow
Pursuer/appellant
Robert Keay and others, trustees of the late George Howat
Defenders/respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustees of a deceased landlord are liable in damages for illness and death allegedly caused by defective drainage during the tenancy after the property was sold to a new owner.
- 2 Whether the pursuer's continued occupation with knowledge of defects bars recovery.
Ratio Decidendi
The action was dismissed as irrelevant because the alleged harm occurred after the property had passed to a new owner, at which point the defenders had neither duty nor power regarding the premises. Additionally, the pursuer, being aware of the defects, assumed the risk by remaining in the house.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Interlocutors of the Sheriff-Substitute and Sheriff adhered to
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment