Fulton v. Stubbs, Ltd [1903] ScotLR 40_620 (30 May 1903)
There is no legal obligation on creditors or their representatives to keep confidential what transpires at a meeting of creditors, and publication of such information, even if resulting in loss to the debtor, is not actionable in law unless a special relationship of confidentiality exists. The pursuer's averments did not disclose a relevant case.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_620
- Parties
- Pursuer: Gregan Fulton; Defender: Stubbs, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor Dismissing Action
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reparation, Wrongful Publication, Confidential Information, Privilege in Publication, Creditors' Meetings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gregan Fulton
Pursuer
Stubbs, Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor Dismissing Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether publication of information from a private creditors' meeting constitutes a legal wrong actionable in damages
- 2 Whether the information disclosed at such a meeting is protected as confidential or private property of the debtor
Ratio Decidendi
There is no legal obligation on creditors or their representatives to keep confidential what transpires at a meeting of creditors, and publication of such information, even if resulting in loss to the debtor, is not actionable in law unless a special relationship of confidentiality exists. The pursuer's averments did not disclose a relevant case.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; action dismissed
Orders
- Court adhered to the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor dismissing the action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment