Rodger (Builders) Ltd v Fawdry [1950] ScotCS CSIH_3 (23 June 1950)
The seller was not entitled to rescind the contract as there was no unjustifiable delay and the ultimatum was not warranted; the subsequent purchasers were not bona fide as they failed to inquire into the prior contract, thus the missives and disposition must be reduced.
- Citation
- [1950] ScotCS CSIH_3
- Parties
- Pursuer: Rodger (Builders) Ltd; First Defender: Mr Fawdry; Second Defender: Mr Bell; Third Defender: Mrs Bell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 1950
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for pursuers
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Contract, Bona Fide Purchaser, Specific Implement, Reduction of Disposition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodger (Builders) Ltd
Pursuer
Mr Fawdry
First Defender
Mr Bell
Second Defender
Mrs Bell
Third Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the seller entitled to rescind the contract for sale due to delay in payment?
- 2 Are subsequent purchasers entitled to protection as bona fide purchasers when aware of a prior contract?
- 3 Is the pursuer entitled to reduction of the subsequent disposition and specific implement?
Ratio Decidendi
The seller was not entitled to rescind the contract as there was no unjustifiable delay and the ultimatum was not warranted; the subsequent purchasers were not bona fide as they failed to inquire into the prior contract, thus the missives and disposition must be reduced.
Court Disposition
judgment for pursuers
Orders
- Reduction of missives and disposition in favour of Mrs Bell
- Specific implement of contract between pursuers and Mr Fawdry
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment