CT against DT (Sheriff Court Civil) [2026] SCAIR 3 (18 November 2025)
It is not in the children's best interests to make an order for direct contact with the defender due to proven abusive behaviour, lack of insight, and practical hurdles. Indirect contact via email is permitted to maintain an avenue for contact, consistent with general principles of child welfare.
- Citation
- [2026] SCAIR 3
- Parties
- Pursuer: CT; Defender: DT
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Family Law / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Residence order granted in favour of pursuer; indirect contact order granted in favour of defender; no order for direct contact; no expenses due to or by either party.
- Legal Topics
- Residence Order, Contact Order, Child Abuse, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CT
Pursuer
DT
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Family Law / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Should a residence order be granted in favour of the pursuer?
- 2 Should direct or indirect contact be ordered for the defender?
- 3 Is it in the best interests of the children to have contact with the defender given proven abuse?
Ratio Decidendi
It is not in the children's best interests to make an order for direct contact with the defender due to proven abusive behaviour, lack of insight, and practical hurdles. Indirect contact via email is permitted to maintain an avenue for contact, consistent with general principles of child welfare.
Court Disposition
Residence order granted in favour of pursuer; indirect contact order granted in favour of defender; no order for direct contact; no expenses due to or by either party.
Orders
- Residence order in terms of section 11(2)(c) of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 in favour of pursuer.
- Order for indirect contact: defender entitled to email children three times per year and on their birthdays via a bespoke email address set up by pursuer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment