Sutherland v Barry & Anor [2001] ScotCS 269 (23 November 2001)
Retention cannot be pleaded as a defence to contractual claims where the counterclaim is delictual and illiquid; the claims for rent, rates, insurance, and value of stock at outgo are admitted and must be compensated against each other, resulting in a balance payable to the pursuer.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 269
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Sutherland; Defender: John Gerard Barry; Defender: Mrs Regina Maria Barry
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Opinion Following Debate on Relevancy of Defences and Counterclaims
- Outcome
- Claims for rent, rates, insurance, and value of stock at outgo admitted; debts to be compensated; balance payable to pursuer; case put out By Order for further discussion.
- Legal Topics
- Retention, Compensation of Debts, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Counterclaim, Lease Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Sutherland
Pursuer
John Gerard Barry
Defender
Mrs Regina Maria Barry
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Opinion Following Debate on Relevancy of Defences and Counterclaims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether retention can be pleaded against contractual claims when the counterclaim is delictual and illiquid
- 2 Whether payment of rent, rates, and insurance under a lease can be withheld pending determination of a fraud claim
- 3 Whether the value of stock at outgo is a relevant counterpart for retention
Ratio Decidendi
Retention cannot be pleaded as a defence to contractual claims where the counterclaim is delictual and illiquid; the claims for rent, rates, insurance, and value of stock at outgo are admitted and must be compensated against each other, resulting in a balance payable to the pursuer.
Court Disposition
Claims for rent, rates, insurance, and value of stock at outgo admitted; debts to be compensated; balance payable to pursuer; case put out By Order for further discussion.
Orders
- Case put out By Order for discussion of means of giving effect to findings and future procedure for remaining issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment