William Baird & Co., Ltd v. Barr [1904] ScotLR 41_385 (03 March 1904)
The liability of the mineral proprietors is strictly limited by the terms of the mineral conveyances to damage caused to ground and to buildings existing at the date of the conveyances. There is no liability for damage to buildings erected after the date of the conveyance, including substituted buildings, nor for increased costs of building on damaged ground, except as it relates to the ground itself. The contractual terms exclude any wider common law liability.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotLR 41_385
- Parties
- Defender: William Baird & Company, Limited; Pursuer: Peter Barr
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; defenders liable only for damage to ground and buildings existing at date of conveyance
- Legal Topics
- Right to Support, Liability for Subsidence, Compensation for Damage to Surface Property, Interpretation of Mineral Conveyances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Baird & Company, Limited
Defender
Peter Barr
Pursuer
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Are mineral proprietors liable for damage caused by subsidence to buildings and ground on the surface under the terms of mineral conveyances?
- 2 Does liability extend to buildings erected after the date of the mineral conveyance, including substituted buildings for those existing at the date of conveyance?
- 3 Is compensation due for increased building costs on damaged ground?
Ratio Decidendi
The liability of the mineral proprietors is strictly limited by the terms of the mineral conveyances to damage caused to ground and to buildings existing at the date of the conveyances. There is no liability for damage to buildings erected after the date of the conveyance, including substituted buildings, nor for increased costs of building on damaged ground, except as it relates to the ground itself. The contractual terms exclude any wider common law liability.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; defenders liable only for damage to ground and buildings existing at date of conveyance
Orders
- Defenders to pay pursuer £47, 8s. for damage to buildings B, D, and E
- Defenders to pay pursuer £115 for damage to vacant ground behind A and B and ground on which buildings F are now erected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment