Cora Foundation & Anor v East Dunbartonshire Council & Anor [2014] ScotCS CSIH_46 (27 May 2014)
Section 10 of the Riotous Assemblies (Scotland) Act 1822 applies to the events at St Mary's School Kenmure; the assembly was unlawful, riotous, and tumultuous, and the claimants are parties injured entitled to compensation. The statute imposes strict liability on the council, and no restriction based on control, public place, or origin of rioters is justified. The reclaiming motions are refused and the Lord Ordinary's interlocutors adhered to.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSIH_46
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Cora Foundation; Pursuer/respondent: The Board of Managers of St Mary's Kenmure; Defender/reclaimer: East Dunbartonshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Appeal Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor Allowing Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- reclaiming motions refused; interlocutors of Lord Ordinary adhered to
- Legal Topics
- Riot Damage, Strict Liability, Statutory Interpretation, Compensation for Property Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cora Foundation
Pursuer/respondent
The Board of Managers of St Mary's Kenmure
Pursuer/respondent
East Dunbartonshire Council
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Appeal Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor Allowing Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the events at St Mary's School Kenmure constituted an 'unlawful, riotous or tumultuous assembly' under section 10 of the Riotous Assemblies (Scotland) Act 1822
- 2 Whether Cora Foundation and the Board qualify as 'parties injured' entitled to compensation under section 10
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 of the Riotous Assemblies (Scotland) Act 1822 applies to the events at St Mary's School Kenmure; the assembly was unlawful, riotous, and tumultuous, and the claimants are parties injured entitled to compensation. The statute imposes strict liability on the council, and no restriction based on control, public place, or origin of rioters is justified. The reclaiming motions are refused and the Lord Ordinary's interlocutors adhered to.
Court Disposition
reclaiming motions refused; interlocutors of Lord Ordinary adhered to
Orders
- Proof before answer allowed in both actions
- Council remains liable to pay compensation under section 10 of the 1822 Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment