APPEAL BY RIVERS LEASING LTD v PAUL PATRICK [2020] ScotSAC Civ 19 (20 February 2018)
The court held that the respondent was liable under the leasing agreement as there was no sufficient evidence of misrepresentation or other grounds to vitiate the contract.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotSAC Civ 19
- Parties
- Appellant: Rivers Leasing Ltd; Respondent: Paul Patrick
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Leasing Agreements, Enforcement of Contractual Obligations
Contract Law Leasing Agreements Enforcement of Contractual Obligations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Rivers Leasing Ltd
Appellant
Paul Patrick
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was liable under the terms of the leasing agreement
- 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to enforce the agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the respondent was liable under the leasing agreement as there was no sufficient evidence of misrepresentation or other grounds to vitiate the contract.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The respondent is found liable under the leasing agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment