Robert Addie & Sons, Ltd v. Coakley [1909] ScotLR 408 (05 February 1909)
The Sheriff, in granting a special warrant to record a memorandum of agreement whose genuineness was disputed, was acting in a judicial capacity, making appeal competent. The memorandum was genuine as it accurately reflected the agreement, and the workman's recovery before registration was not a valid objection to recording.
- Citation
- [1909] ScotLR 408
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert Addie & Sons, Limited; Respondent: Patrick Coakley
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session (on Appeal From Sheriff Court at Airdrie)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Sheriff-Substitute's decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Recording of Agreement, Competency of Appeal, Judicial Vs Ministerial Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Addie & Sons, Limited
Appellant
Patrick Coakley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session (on Appeal From Sheriff Court at Airdrie)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff acted in a judicial or ministerial capacity in granting warrant to record a disputed memorandum of agreement under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906
- 2 Whether the fact that the workman had recovered before the memorandum was lodged invalidated the recording of the agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff, in granting a special warrant to record a memorandum of agreement whose genuineness was disputed, was acting in a judicial capacity, making appeal competent. The memorandum was genuine as it accurately reflected the agreement, and the workman's recovery before registration was not a valid objection to recording.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Sheriff-Substitute's decision affirmed.
Orders
- Warrant to record the memorandum of agreement granted.
- One guinea of expenses awarded to Coakley.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment