BYRES, ROBERT BYRES v PHILIP MOORE [2018] ScotSAC Civ 17 (29 June 2018)
The sheriff did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion in awarding expenses against the appellant; the appeal is refused.
- Citation
- [2018] ScotSAC Civ 17
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert Byres; Respondent: Philip Moore
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision, Expenses, Summary Cause Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Robert Byres
Appellant
Philip Moore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in awarding expenses against the appellant in a summary cause action
- 2 Whether the sheriff properly exercised discretion in the award of expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion in awarding expenses against the appellant; the appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- The appeal is refused
- The sheriff's award of expenses is affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment