ROBERT McBRIDE v PROCURATOR FISCAL, AYR [2016] ScotSAC Crim 20 (29 June 2016)

ROBERT McBRIDE v PROCURATOR FISCAL, AYR [2016] ScotSAC Crim 20 (29 June 2016)

The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the reasons given were sufficient and justified by the appellant's circumstances.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ScotSAC Crim 20
Parties
Appellant: Robert McBride; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Ayr
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
29 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Bail Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert McBride

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal, Ayr

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law in refusing bail, as the reasons given were sufficient and justified by the appellant's circumstances.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • bail refused
  • appellant to remain in custody