M'Millan & Son, Ltd v. Rowan & Co. [1903] ScotLR 40_265 (16 January 1903)
The court has no jurisdiction under the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894 to appoint an arbiter where the contract merely provides for reference 'to arbitration' without specifying whether the reference is to a single arbiter or to two arbiters; the statutory procedure for court appointment is only available in those specified cases.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_265
- Parties
- Petitioner: M'Millan & Son, Limited; Respondent: Rowan & Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under Arbitration (scotland) Act 1894 / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Refusal of Petition
- Outcome
- petition refused; interlocutor affirmed; court adhered
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbiter, Jurisdiction Under Arbitration (scotland) Act 1894, Validity of Arbitration Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M'Millan & Son, Limited
Petitioner
Rowan & Company
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Arbitration (scotland) Act 1894 / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Refusal of Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction under the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894 to appoint an arbiter where the contract refers disputes simply 'to arbitration' without specifying the number or identity of arbiters.
- 2 Whether a general reference to arbitration is sufficient to invoke the statutory procedure for court appointment of an arbiter.
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no jurisdiction under the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894 to appoint an arbiter where the contract merely provides for reference 'to arbitration' without specifying whether the reference is to a single arbiter or to two arbiters; the statutory procedure for court appointment is only available in those specified cases.
Court Disposition
petition refused; interlocutor affirmed; court adhered
Orders
- Prayer of the petition refused.
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment