ROY BROWN [2016] ScotSAC Crim 32 (1 November 2016)

ROY BROWN [2016] ScotSAC Crim 32 (1 November 2016)

The court held that the sheriff failed to give adequate reasons for refusing bail and did not properly apply the statutory criteria, warranting the grant of bail.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ScotSAC Crim 32
Parties
Appellant: Roy Brown; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Bail, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Bail Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roy Brown

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail to the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the sheriff failed to give adequate reasons for refusing bail and did not properly apply the statutory criteria, warranting the grant of bail.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Bail granted to the appellant.