Hepburn v Law [1913] ScotCS CSIH_4 (12 July 1913)

Hepburn v Law [1913] ScotCS CSIH_4 (12 July 1913)

The transaction was not a genuine sale but a security arrangement, as the parties intended Mr Weir to retain the right to redeem the furniture and no real transfer of ownership or possession occurred; thus, Mr Law's claim to ownership failed and the articles remained subject to poinding.

Citation
[1913] ScotCS CSIH_4
Parties
Pursuer: James Hepburn; Defender: Rev. J. S. Weir; Minuter/claimant: William Law
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 July 1913
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session (inner House)
Outcome
appeal allowed; claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods, Security Over Movables, Sham Transactions, Ownership Transfer
Commercial Law Property Law Sale of Goods Security Over Movables Sham Transactions Ownership Transfer

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Hepburn

Pursuer

Rev. J. S. Weir

Defender

William Law

Minuter/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff to Court of Session (inner House)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the transaction between Mr Weir and Mr Law was an out-and-out sale or a security disguised as a sale
  2. 2 Whether Mr Law acquired ownership of the furniture under the Sale of Goods Act 1893

Ratio Decidendi

The transaction was not a genuine sale but a security arrangement, as the parties intended Mr Weir to retain the right to redeem the furniture and no real transfer of ownership or possession occurred; thus, Mr Law's claim to ownership failed and the articles remained subject to poinding.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; claim dismissed

Orders

  • Sheriff-substitute's judgment restored
  • William Law's claim to withdraw the articles from poinding refused