Jamieson v. Welsh [1900] ScotLR 38_96 (30 November 1900)
Where a contract of sale covers both heritable subjects and moveable fittings, and the disposition conveys only the heritable subjects without reference to the contract or the moveables, the missives remain effective regarding the moveables. Acceptance of the disposition does not extinguish the purchaser's rights to fittings under the missives, as the disposition is not a habile mode of transferring corporeal moveables.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 38_96
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Jamieson; Defender: John Welsh
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proof allowed to both parties of their respective averments.
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Heritable Property, Fixtures and Fittings, Missives of Sale, Disposition, Supersession of Contract by Conveyance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Jamieson
Pursuer
John Welsh
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the missives of sale regarding 'fittings' are superseded by the subsequent disposition
- 2 Whether the purchaser retains rights to moveable fittings not mentioned in the disposition
- 3 Whether acceptance of disposition extinguishes rights to corporeal moveables under the contract
Ratio Decidendi
Where a contract of sale covers both heritable subjects and moveable fittings, and the disposition conveys only the heritable subjects without reference to the contract or the moveables, the missives remain effective regarding the moveables. Acceptance of the disposition does not extinguish the purchaser's rights to fittings under the missives, as the disposition is not a habile mode of transferring corporeal moveables.
Court Disposition
Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proof allowed to both parties of their respective averments.
Orders
- Recall the interlocutor of 14 July 1900.
- Allow both parties a proof of their respective averments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment