Perth School Board v. Henderson [1917] ScotLR 203 (25 January 1917)

Perth School Board v. Henderson [1917] ScotLR 203 (25 January 1917)

The Court held that the School Board was entitled to differentiate between pupils in fixing fees, provided the distinction was based on reasonable grounds and not arbitrary, capricious, or corrupt. The circumstances of pupils who had commenced at Sharp's Institution before amalgamation were materially different, justifying the fee differentiation. The Board acted within its statutory powers under section 53 of the Education (Scotland) Act 1872.

Citation
[1917] ScotLR 203
Parties
Pursuer: Perth School Board; Defender: Rev. John William Henderson
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
25 January 1917
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
School Fees, Powers of School Boards, Discrimination Between Pupils, Statutory Interpretation, Public Body Discretion
Education Law Administrative Law Public Law School Fees Powers of School Boards Discrimination Between Pupils Statutory Interpretation Public Body Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Perth School Board

Pursuer

Rev. John William Henderson

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a school board may lawfully charge different fees to pupils receiving the same education in the same school based on their prior attendance at amalgamated institutions.
  2. 2 Whether such differentiation constitutes illegal or undue preference under the Education (Scotland) Act 1872, section 53.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the School Board was entitled to differentiate between pupils in fixing fees, provided the distinction was based on reasonable grounds and not arbitrary, capricious, or corrupt. The circumstances of pupils who had commenced at Sharp's Institution before amalgamation were materially different, justifying the fee differentiation. The Board acted within its statutory powers under section 53 of the Education (Scotland) Act 1872.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defender's pleas repelled
  • Decree granted in terms of the summons for payment of fees