N parent of the child AB against City of Edinburgh Council Placing in Schools Committee (Sheriff Court Civil) [2024] SCEDIN 50 (26 November 2024)
The statutory grounds of refusal under section 28A(3A) and 28A(3)(a)(vii) exist, and in all the circumstances, including availability of alternative schools and the pursuer's reasons being primarily convenience, it is appropriate to confirm the education authority's decision.
- Citation
- [2024] SCEDIN 50
- Parties
- Pursuer: N, parent of the child AB; Defender: City of Edinburgh Council Placing in Schools Committee
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment After Evidential Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- School Placing Requests, Appeal Against Refusal, School Capacity, Reserved Places Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N, parent of the child AB
Pursuer
City of Edinburgh Council Placing in Schools Committee
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment After Evidential Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether grounds of refusal under section 28A(3A) and 28A(3)(a)(vii) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 exist
- 2 Whether in all the circumstances it is appropriate to confirm the education authority's decision
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory grounds of refusal under section 28A(3A) and 28A(3)(a)(vii) exist, and in all the circumstances, including availability of alternative schools and the pursuer's reasons being primarily convenience, it is appropriate to confirm the education authority's decision.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- decision of the education authority confirmed
- no expenses due to or by either party
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment