Dumfries & Galloway Council, Re Application For Judicial Review [2000] ScotCS 217 (2 August 2000)
The Notices of 28 October 1999 constituted conscious decisions by the Scottish Ministers as to the timing of the transfer of responsibility for roads, and are susceptible to judicial review. The Petitioners did not acquiesce or cause prejudice by delay, as ongoing discussions and reservation of position were evident. The petition is not incompetent, as the statutory procedures for challenging the Orders do not apply to the timing of the Notices, and the ouster clause does not bar the proceedings.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 217
- Parties
- Petitioner: Dumfries and Galloway Council; Respondent: Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / First Hearing on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary pleas for dismissal by the Respondents repelled; petition to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation, Local Government, Roads and Highways, Delay and Acquiescence, Competency of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dumfries and Galloway Council
Petitioner
Scottish Ministers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / First Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Notices issued by the Scottish Ministers on 28 October 1999 constitute decisions susceptible to judicial review
- 2 Whether the petition is barred by delay (mora) and acquiescence
- 3 Whether the petition is incompetent due to failure to exhaust alternative statutory remedies or due to statutory ouster
Ratio Decidendi
The Notices of 28 October 1999 constituted conscious decisions by the Scottish Ministers as to the timing of the transfer of responsibility for roads, and are susceptible to judicial review. The Petitioners did not acquiesce or cause prejudice by delay, as ongoing discussions and reservation of position were evident. The petition is not incompetent, as the statutory procedures for challenging the Orders do not apply to the timing of the Notices, and the ouster clause does not bar the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Preliminary pleas for dismissal by the Respondents repelled; petition to proceed.
Orders
- Case to be put out By Order for further procedure on 15 August 2000 at 10.00am.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment