Scottish Ministers (Written evidence to James Hamilton's investigation into the First Minister under the Ministerial Code) [2023] ScotIC 004_2023 (31 January 2023)
The Commissioner determined that the exemptions claimed by the Scottish Ministers were not sufficiently substantiated and that the public interest in disclosure outweighed the arguments for confidentiality.
- Citation
- [2023] ScotIC 004_2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Scottish Ministers; Respondent: James Hamilton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Appeal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Ministerial Code, Freedom of Information, Public Accountability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Scottish Ministers
Applicant
James Hamilton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Appeal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether written evidence to James Hamilton's investigation into the First Minister under the Ministerial Code should be disclosed under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner determined that the exemptions claimed by the Scottish Ministers were not sufficiently substantiated and that the public interest in disclosure outweighed the arguments for confidentiality.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Scottish Ministers are required to disclose the written evidence to James Hamilton's investigation into the First Minister under the Ministerial Code
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment