Strathern v Seaforth (Albert) [1926] ScotHC HCJ_1 (12 March 1926)

Strathern v Seaforth (Albert) [1926] ScotHC HCJ_1 (12 March 1926)

A complaint alleging clandestine taking and use of a motor car, without the owner's permission and with knowledge that permission would have been refused, is relevant and discloses a crime under Scots law; the Sheriff-substitute erred in dismissing it as irrelevant without inquiry.

Citation
[1926] ScotHC HCJ_1
Parties
Prosecutor: Strathern; Respondent: Seaforth (Albert)
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 March 1926
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint as Irrelevant
Outcome
Appeal allowed; complaint reinstated for inquiry
Legal Topics
Theft, Unauthorised Use of Property, Common Law Offences
Criminal Law Theft Unauthorised Use of Property Common Law Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Strathern

Prosecutor

Seaforth (Albert)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint as Irrelevant

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether taking and using a motor car clandestinely, without the owner's permission and knowing permission would have been refused, constitutes a crime under Scots law
  2. 2 Whether the complaint was relevant and should proceed to inquiry

Ratio Decidendi

A complaint alleging clandestine taking and use of a motor car, without the owner's permission and with knowledge that permission would have been refused, is relevant and discloses a crime under Scots law; the Sheriff-substitute erred in dismissing it as irrelevant without inquiry.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; complaint reinstated for inquiry

Orders

  • The question put to the court answered in the negative
  • Complaint to proceed to inquiry before the Sheriff-substitute