Lochrie v. M'Gregor. Lochrie Petitioner [1910] ScotLR 41 (09 November 1910)

Lochrie v. M'Gregor. Lochrie Petitioner [1910] ScotLR 41 (09 November 1910)

A clerical error in the citation copy does not invalidate sequestration proceedings where the substantive creditor qualification is met and no prejudice is shown; recall of a going sequestration is not warranted absent evidence of creditor preferences that would be cut down under the first petition.

Citation
[1910] ScotLR 41
Parties
Petitioner/appellant/reclaimer: Robert Lochrie; Respondent/defender: Jeanie M'Gregor
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
09 November 1910
Procedural Posture
Petition for Sequestration and Appeal/reclaiming Note / Appeal and Reclaiming Note Heard Together; Judgment Delivered
Outcome
Appeal partially allowed; reclaiming note refused
Legal Topics
Sequestration, Citation Error, Preferences, Recall of Sequestration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Lochrie

Petitioner/appellant/reclaimer

Jeanie M'Gregor

Respondent/defender

Procedural Posture

Petition for Sequestration and Appeal/reclaiming Note / Appeal and Reclaiming Note Heard Together; Judgment Delivered

  1. 1 Whether a clerical error in the citation copy of a petition for sequestration invalidates proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the Court should recall a going sequestration when no creditor preferences are alleged

Ratio Decidendi

A clerical error in the citation copy does not invalidate sequestration proceedings where the substantive creditor qualification is met and no prejudice is shown; recall of a going sequestration is not warranted absent evidence of creditor preferences that would be cut down under the first petition.

Court Disposition

Appeal partially allowed; reclaiming note refused

Orders

  • Interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled in so far as it found pursuer liable in payment to defender Jeanie M'Gregor in thirty shillings of expenses; instead, Jeanie M'Gregor found liable to pursuer in thirty shillings of expenses
  • Quoad ultra, interlocutor affirmed and decerned