Christie's Trustee v. Leith, Hull, and Hamburg Steam Packet Co., Ltd [1915] ScotLR 674 (21 May 1915)
The bankrupt employee, while still in service, had no vested right to demand delivery of the policy or its surrender value; his rights were contingent upon leaving service or reaching a specified age. The trustee could not acquire greater rights than the bankrupt, and the policy was not an asset of the estate at the time of bankruptcy. The contractual scheme governing the policy precluded delivery or realisation by the trustee while the employee remained employed.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 674
- Parties
- Pursuer: Charles Simon Romanes, C. A., Edinburgh, trustee on the sequestrated estates of Thomas Christie, Grangemouth; Defender: Leith, Hull, and Hamburg Steam Packet Company, Limited, Leith
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed, interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled, defenders assoilzied (absolved)
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration, Vesting of Estate, Employee Benefit Schemes, Bond of Annuity, Superannuation, Surrender Value, Contingent Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Simon Romanes, C. A., Edinburgh, trustee on the sequestrated estates of Thomas Christie, Grangemouth
Pursuer
Leith, Hull, and Hamburg Steam Packet Company, Limited, Leith
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the policy of annuity under the superannuation scheme vested in the trustee on the sequestrated estate of the bankrupt employee
- 2 Whether the trustee was entitled to delivery of the policy or its surrender value while the employee remained in service
Ratio Decidendi
The bankrupt employee, while still in service, had no vested right to demand delivery of the policy or its surrender value; his rights were contingent upon leaving service or reaching a specified age. The trustee could not acquire greater rights than the bankrupt, and the policy was not an asset of the estate at the time of bankruptcy. The contractual scheme governing the policy precluded delivery or realisation by the trustee while the employee remained employed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed, interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled, defenders assoilzied (absolved)
Orders
- Sheriff-Substitute's decree recalled
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment