Overwaele v. Hacking And Paterson & Anor [2004] ScotCS 144 (22 April 2004)

Overwaele v. Hacking And Paterson & Anor [2004] ScotCS 144 (22 April 2004)

The pursuer had ample notice and opportunity to prepare; no substantive evidence was provided to support amendment; the debt exceeded the statutory minimum for sequestration. The pursuer's motions for discharge and amendment were refused, and the action was dismissed by consent.

Citation
[2004] ScotCS 144
Parties
Pursuer: M. Van Overwaele; Defender: Hacking & Paterson; Defender: C. Russell & William Duncan Co.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
22 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll Hearing, Motion for Discharge, Motion for Leave to Amend, Motion for Dismissal
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Sequestration, Recall of Sequestration, Statutory Debt Limits, Amendment of Pleadings, Delay Tactics
Bankruptcy Civil Procedure Sequestration Recall of Sequestration Statutory Debt Limits Amendment of Pleadings Delay Tactics

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M. Van Overwaele

Pursuer

Hacking & Paterson

Defender

C. Russell & William Duncan Co.

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Procedure Roll Hearing, Motion for Discharge, Motion for Leave to Amend, Motion for Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer's debt was below the statutory minimum for sequestration
  2. 2 Whether the pursuer should be allowed to amend pleadings
  3. 3 Whether the procedure roll hearing should be discharged

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer had ample notice and opportunity to prepare; no substantive evidence was provided to support amendment; the debt exceeded the statutory minimum for sequestration. The pursuer's motions for discharge and amendment were refused, and the action was dismissed by consent.

Court Disposition

action dismissed

Orders

  • Pursuer's five pleas-in-law repelled
  • Defenders' first plea-in-law sustained